<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web log analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/</link>
	<description>Give books away, get books you want.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:19:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Booksmooch at Deeplinking</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-11046</link>
		<dc:creator>Booksmooch at Deeplinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-11046</guid>
		<description>[...] the other hand, PaperBackSwap&#8217;s traffic is higher than that of BookMooch and they have more books available. They&#8217;re also clearly out to be the Oprah of the modern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the other hand, PaperBackSwap&#8217;s traffic is higher than that of BookMooch and they have more books available. They&#8217;re also clearly out to be the Oprah of the modern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda M Otvos</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-11019</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda M Otvos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-11019</guid>
		<description>Love the site, the book senders and moochers, the camaraderie, the selection, agree that the topics and books are misfiled-oh well-it is free!!

Very happy to have found you, I tell everyone I know-we&#039;re all readers.

Keep the charts coming, John.

Sincerely,
LMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the site, the book senders and moochers, the camaraderie, the selection, agree that the topics and books are misfiled-oh well-it is free!!</p>
<p>Very happy to have found you, I tell everyone I know-we&#8217;re all readers.</p>
<p>Keep the charts coming, John.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
LMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evy MacPhee</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-11006</link>
		<dc:creator>Evy MacPhee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-11006</guid>
		<description>I qualify as someone who doesn&#039;t have an affordable second-hand bookstore any more.

I do live in a town with a gloriously wonderful library system.

Best,

Evy

http://www.bookmooch.com/m/inventory/evy47</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I qualify as someone who doesn&#8217;t have an affordable second-hand bookstore any more.</p>
<p>I do live in a town with a gloriously wonderful library system.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Evy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookmooch.com/m/inventory/evy47" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookmooch.com/m/inventory/evy47</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10986</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10986</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad this place is still growing :)  More people really ought to know about it, especially if they live in a town that doesn&#039;t have a second hand bookstore [anymore].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad this place is still growing <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   More people really ought to know about it, especially if they live in a town that doesn&#8217;t have a second hand bookstore [anymore].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10735</guid>
		<description>I got the cards &amp; thanks!
I&#039;ve started including them in jewelers orders &amp; promotional mailers.
My e-commerce customers are also getting a card with their orders.
I travel around the southeast visiting wholesale accounts &amp; will be leaving cards in Books a Million&#039;s &amp; Barnes &amp; Nobles unless you tell me not to!!!
Love your work!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the cards &amp; thanks!<br />
I&#8217;ve started including them in jewelers orders &amp; promotional mailers.<br />
My e-commerce customers are also getting a card with their orders.<br />
I travel around the southeast visiting wholesale accounts &amp; will be leaving cards in Books a Million&#8217;s &amp; Barnes &amp; Nobles unless you tell me not to!!!<br />
Love your work!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coqueline</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10733</link>
		<dc:creator>Coqueline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10733</guid>
		<description>To Rachel:

I think a lot of people who are listed as &#039;Ask first&#039; don&#039;t really WANT to be emailed every single time an international moocher is interested in their books, but simply because the only other options are &#039;Worldwide&#039; and &#039;Only to my country&#039;. These people usually write conditions on what and where they&#039;d send internationally on their profile, and it&#039;s pretty clear.

Being locked up from mooching at all until email correspondence is confirmed is basically putting most international moochers at the bottom of the food chain, since they&#039;ll never be fast enough to mooch anything that is remotely high on demand.

If there ever is a new category like &#039;Send internationally on conditions&#039;, I would jump ship right away from being an Ask-First-er to the other one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Rachel:</p>
<p>I think a lot of people who are listed as &#8216;Ask first&#8217; don&#8217;t really WANT to be emailed every single time an international moocher is interested in their books, but simply because the only other options are &#8216;Worldwide&#8217; and &#8216;Only to my country&#8217;. These people usually write conditions on what and where they&#8217;d send internationally on their profile, and it&#8217;s pretty clear.</p>
<p>Being locked up from mooching at all until email correspondence is confirmed is basically putting most international moochers at the bottom of the food chain, since they&#8217;ll never be fast enough to mooch anything that is remotely high on demand.</p>
<p>If there ever is a new category like &#8216;Send internationally on conditions&#8217;, I would jump ship right away from being an Ask-First-er to the other one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Campbell [scamp8: CA (USA)]</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10731</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Campbell [scamp8: CA (USA)]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to see some stats on how many people sign on, list some books (perhaps at least ten), but get no mooches and end up going away pretty quickly. My suspicion is that there are a significant number of them. I also suspect that it would not take a lot to retain a good percentage of them, if they were to get just a mooch or two. If my assumptions are correct, I&#039;d like to see something systematic that aims at retention.

For example, could we have the system track new members who have some minimum number of books in their inventory (again, ten might be a good minimum), and who also do not get any mooches for perhaps their first week. I&#039;m quite sure we could get a goodly number of folks on a list who would volunteer to mooch a book from such folks, and also extend a welcome and offer assistance to such Newbies. Perhaps something like the ransom wishlist process could be implemented to choose a member from that list, and request that they help get the new member started. If they could not do it, another member from the list could be randomly chosen.

My suggestion makes assumptions about the ability to track new members and their inventories, and whether or not they get any mooches, and I really have no idea if these are reasonable assumptions. It also assumes that the numbers of such short-lived members is large enough to warrant the effort to retain them, and even whether or not such information could be available.

What say you John? If John says it&#039;s possible, anyone else have some thoughts about this or other good uses of Web log stats?

Stuart (USA: CA)
(scamp8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see some stats on how many people sign on, list some books (perhaps at least ten), but get no mooches and end up going away pretty quickly. My suspicion is that there are a significant number of them. I also suspect that it would not take a lot to retain a good percentage of them, if they were to get just a mooch or two. If my assumptions are correct, I&#8217;d like to see something systematic that aims at retention.</p>
<p>For example, could we have the system track new members who have some minimum number of books in their inventory (again, ten might be a good minimum), and who also do not get any mooches for perhaps their first week. I&#8217;m quite sure we could get a goodly number of folks on a list who would volunteer to mooch a book from such folks, and also extend a welcome and offer assistance to such Newbies. Perhaps something like the ransom wishlist process could be implemented to choose a member from that list, and request that they help get the new member started. If they could not do it, another member from the list could be randomly chosen.</p>
<p>My suggestion makes assumptions about the ability to track new members and their inventories, and whether or not they get any mooches, and I really have no idea if these are reasonable assumptions. It also assumes that the numbers of such short-lived members is large enough to warrant the effort to retain them, and even whether or not such information could be available.</p>
<p>What say you John? If John says it&#8217;s possible, anyone else have some thoughts about this or other good uses of Web log stats?</p>
<p>Stuart (USA: CA)<br />
(scamp8)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10725</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10725</guid>
		<description>John, 
I know this does not apply to this blog, but since it is still on people&#039;s minds as mentioned above, I have some ideas I just thought I&#039;d share about rectifying the &quot;ask first&quot; problem. 

1) Could you make it so that when a person was listed as &quot;ask first&quot;, any international mooch pulled up a window that asked the moocher: &#039;Have you emailed the person and received permission to mooch this book?&#039; If they click yes, the mooch can proceed; if they click no, the mooch is stopped and they are prompted to email the person. If it could be set up this way, it would prevent us making the mistake of mooching without asking. (However, if a person were not honest this would not work...) I imagine a lot of the time a mooch is made w/o asking first is just due to an oversight; it is easy to overlook that the moocher requests to be asked first. I have almost completed a mooch different times without asking first before I realized I was supposed to ask. 

2) Is there a way to lock out international moochers for people who want to be asked first, similar to how we cannot mooch from someone international who will only send to their country, with a difference being that we as individuals could go onto BookMooch and unlock a particular book if someone international has requested it and we are able to send it to them?

I just had those ideas so I thought I&#039;d share. I&#039;d be excited if one of these ideas proves helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
I know this does not apply to this blog, but since it is still on people&#8217;s minds as mentioned above, I have some ideas I just thought I&#8217;d share about rectifying the &#8220;ask first&#8221; problem. </p>
<p>1) Could you make it so that when a person was listed as &#8220;ask first&#8221;, any international mooch pulled up a window that asked the moocher: &#8216;Have you emailed the person and received permission to mooch this book?&#8217; If they click yes, the mooch can proceed; if they click no, the mooch is stopped and they are prompted to email the person. If it could be set up this way, it would prevent us making the mistake of mooching without asking. (However, if a person were not honest this would not work&#8230;) I imagine a lot of the time a mooch is made w/o asking first is just due to an oversight; it is easy to overlook that the moocher requests to be asked first. I have almost completed a mooch different times without asking first before I realized I was supposed to ask. </p>
<p>2) Is there a way to lock out international moochers for people who want to be asked first, similar to how we cannot mooch from someone international who will only send to their country, with a difference being that we as individuals could go onto BookMooch and unlock a particular book if someone international has requested it and we are able to send it to them?</p>
<p>I just had those ideas so I thought I&#8217;d share. I&#8217;d be excited if one of these ideas proves helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaniardX</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10721</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaniardX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10721</guid>
		<description>Interesting charts, John.

Oh, and the Bookmooch cards that I had asked for arrived today. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting charts, John.</p>
<p>Oh, and the Bookmooch cards that I had asked for arrived today. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Widdowson</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookmooch.com/2008/05/14/web-log-analysis/#comment-10719</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Widdowson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookmooch.com/?p=660#comment-10719</guid>
		<description>Hi

It would be really interesting to see which countries are mooching and then link that to the number of active members- see where the international moochers are

Also would be interesting to see the proportion of moochers providing international mooching to local mooching as well

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>It would be really interesting to see which countries are mooching and then link that to the number of active members- see where the international moochers are</p>
<p>Also would be interesting to see the proportion of moochers providing international mooching to local mooching as well</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
